Teardown: the $7,200 a desk review almost missed

A single-family home, moderate hail, 214 field photos. The desk reviewer had nine other files that afternoon. Here's the photo dump, the report InstaBud produced from it, and the gap between them.

What the quick review captured

• Roof field bruising and mat fracture on the south slope
• Soft-metal collateral: gutters, downspouts, two vents
• Screen damage on the rear elevation

Solid, defensible — and what most reviewers would log in a few minutes per file.

What InstaBud added

• Granular hail count by slope — pushing the roof from "repairable" to a full replacement under the carrier's own threshold.
• Step-flashing displacement at the chimney — a hidden water path that would have surfaced as an interior supplement weeks later.
• Detached drip edge on the north eave, easy to miss in a thumbnail.

The delta

Those three findings moved the scope by roughly $7,200 — and, more importantly, caught it on day one instead of as a re-inspection. The point isn't that the reviewer was careless. It's that fatigue, volume, and 200-photo files mean details slip. InstaBud reviews every pixel of every photo with the same intensity on photo #1 and photo #214.

Want your own loss run through InstaBud? Show us a report.